Minnesota Legal Periodical Index on LawMoose: Prepared by the Minnesota State Law Library.

You requested articles having case name word(s) of all and citations like all on the subject of INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY in all journals in MLPI 1984 - present

1. A & M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001)
Discussed in: "Napster: Facilitation of Sharing, or Contributory and Vicarious Copyright Infringement?"
Author(s): Mota, Sue Ann
2 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 61 (No. 2, 2001)

2. AF Holdings v. Does 1-1058, No.12-7135 (US CT. APP. May 27, 2014
Discussed in: "Court limits bit torrent mass joinder: Decision could affect alleged copyright trolls."
Author(s): Ahlin, Elizabeth
18 MINNESOTA LAWYER 2 (No. 26, June 30, 2014)

3. Alappat, In re, 33 F.3d 1526 (Fed. Cir. 1994)
Discussed in: "Towards a Rational Jurisprudence of Computer-Related Patentability in Light of In re Alappat"
Author(s): Burtis, John A.
79 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1129 (No. 5, May 1995)

4. American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, Inc., 802 F.Supp. 1 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)
Discussed in: "Lawful Photocopying: Where Fair Use Becomes Unfair"
Author(s): Stueber, Thomas J. & Fairbairn, David R.
49 BENCH & BAR OF MINNESOTA 21 (No. 9, October 1992)

5. Amgen, Inc. v. U.S. International Trade Commission, 902 F.2d 1532 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Discussed in: "Amgen, Inc. v. U.S. International Trade Commission: Designer Genes Don't Fit"
Author(s): Viksnins, Ann Sturtz
76 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 161 (No. 1, October 1991)

6. Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith, No. 21–869 (U.S. May 18, 2023)
Discussed in: "Warhol foundation loses Prince portrait case: Minnesota professor says ruling still leaves plenty of room for creativity"
Author(s): Minnesota Lawyer Staff
97 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No. 1, May 22, 2023)

7. Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, No. 10-98 (U.S. May 31, 2011)
Discussed in: "U.S. Supreme Court: Ashcroft Immune, Patent Claim Requires Scienter. [news note]"
15 MINNESOTA LAWYER 4 (No. 23, June 6, 2011)

8. Ashley Furniture Industries v. SanGiacomo N.A. Ltd., 187 F.3d 363 (4th Cir. 1999)
Discussed in: "Product Configuration Trade Dress and Abercrombie: Analysis of Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. SanGiacomo N.A. Ltd."
Author(s): Sabnis, Rohit A.
1 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 183 (No. 1, 2000)

9. Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99 (1880)
Discussed in: "Baker v. Selden, Computer Programs, 17 U.S.C. Section 102(b) and Whelan Revisited"
Author(s): Lundberg, Steven W., Gates, George H. & Sumner, John
13 HAMLINE LAW REVIEW 221 (No. 2, Spring 1990)

10. Bayer AG v. Schein Pharm., Inc., 301 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
Discussed in: "Bayer AG v. Schein Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: A Pharmaceutical Company’s Victory in Securing a Patent Monopoly over Ciprofloxacin"
Author(s): Gilbert, Glenna L.
5 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 87 (No. 1, 2003)

11. Beaulieu v. Stockwell, No. 21-3833 (8th Cir. Aug. 30, 2022)
Discussed in: "Prince photographer falls short: 8th Circuit panel rules in dispute over possession and use of pictures"
Author(s): Brown, Laura
96 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No. 32, September 8, 2022)

12. Bowman v. Monsanto, Co., No.11-796 (U.S. May 13, 2013)
Discussed in: "Supreme Court treads carefully in patent ruling: Big questions about self-replicating technologies left open."
Author(s): Atkins, Kimberly
17 MINNESOTA LAWYER 9 (No. 20, May 20, 2013)

13. Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films, 383 F.3d 390 (6th Cir. 2004)
Discussed in: "Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films: The Death of the Substantial Similarity Test in Digital Sampling Copyright Infringement Claims - The 6th Circuit's Flawed Attempt at a Bright-Line Rule"
Author(s): Brodin, Matthew
6 MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 825 (No. 2, May 2005)

14. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Tavern 129 LLC, File No. 20-cv-435 (ECT/DTS) (D. Minn. June 11, 2021)
Discussed in: "Music industry notches win against bar: BMI, other rights holders awarded $28,000 judgment against defunct Winona tavern"
Author(s): Featherly, Kevin
SESSION/LAW (June 15, 2021)

15. C.B.C. Distribution & Marketing, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media, L.P., 443 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (E.D. Mo. 2006)
Discussed in: "C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media, LP: Why Major League Baseball Struck Out and Won't Have Better Luck in its Next Trip to the Plate"
Author(s): Mead, Daniel
8 MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 715 (No. 2, Spring 2007)

16. Capitol Records Inc., et al. v. Thomas
Discussed in: "A Few Noteworthy Moments from Minnesota's Music Download Case: Singing the blues about music piracy."
Author(s): Jones, Barbara L.
13 MINNESOTA LAWYER 3 (No. 25, June 22, 2009)

17. Chapman v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co., A08-1153 (Minn. Ct. App. June 30, 2009)
Discussed in: "Court of Appeals Affirms Summary Judgment for MLM. [news note]"
13 MINNESOTA LAWYER 2 (No. 27, July 6, 2009)

18. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 109 S.Ct. 2166 (1989)
Discussed in: "Whose Copyright Is It Anyway?"
Author(s): Bergerson, Stephen R.
46 BENCH & BAR OF MINNESOTA 26 (No. 9, October 1989)

19. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 109 S.Ct. 2166 (1989)
Discussed in: "Work For Hire Copyright Defined"
Author(s): Naugle, Gregory J.
13 HAMLINE LAW REVIEW 353 (No. 2, Spring 1990)

20. Cooley v. Target Corporation, Civil No. 20-2152 (DWF/DTS) (D. Minn. Sept. 28, 2022)
Discussed in: "Judge rejects teen artist's copyright claim against Target"
Author(s): Brown, Laura
96 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No. 40, October 6, 2022)

21. Cooley v. Target Corporation, Civil No. 20-2152 (DWF/DTS) (D. Minn. Mar. 29, 2021)
Discussed in: "Teen artist wins round against Target: Complaint says retailer's 'scribble dots' products infringe on copyright [Nolan Ocean Cooley]"
Author(s): Nelson, Todd
94 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No. 93, April 12, 2021)

22. Deeper UAB v. Vexilar, No. IPR2018-01310, (P.T.A.B. Jan. 24, 2019)
Discussed in: "Fish-finder patent case is the one that got away"
Author(s): Jones, Barbara L.
92 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No. 98, May 2, 2019)

23. eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. (eBay III), 547 U.S. 388 (2006)
Discussed in: "After eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange: The Changing Landscape for Patent Remedies"
Author(s): Chao, Bernard H.
9 MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 543 (No. 2, Spring 2008)

24. Eldred v. Ashcroft, 123 S.Ct. 769 (2003)
Discussed in: "Dangerous Step Toward the Over Protection of Intellectual Property: Rethinking Eldred v. Ashcroft"
Author(s): Stanley, Caren L.
26 HAMLINE LAW REVIEW 679 (No. 3, Spring 2003)

25. Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003)
Discussed in: "Unwise or Unconstitutional?: The Copyright Term Extension Act, the Eldred Decision, and the Freezing of the Public Domain for Private Benefit"
Author(s): Langvardt, Arlen W. & Langvardt, Kyle T.
5 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 193 (No. 2, 2004)

26. Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003)
Discussed in: "Conflicting Visions and Contested Baselines: Intellectual Property and Free Speech in the "Digital Millennium""
Author(s): Farber, Daniel A.
89 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1318 (No. 5, May 2005)

27. Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003)
Discussed in: "Life After Eldred: The Supreme Court and the Future of Copyright"
Author(s): Leaffer, Marshall
30 WILLIAM MITCHELL LAW REVIEW 1597 (No. 5, 2004)

28. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc., 110 S.Ct. 2683 (1990)
Discussed in: "FDA Medical Device Approval: Noninfringing Experimental Use Defense Is Expanded"
Author(s): McCoy, Timothy
14 HAMLINE LAW REVIEW 201 (No. 1, Fall 1990)

29. Envirotech Corp. v. Westech Engineering, Inc., 904 F.2d 1571 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Discussed in: "On-Sale Bar to Patentability and Executory Sales Offers"
Author(s): Schaefer, Stephen R.
75 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1505 (No. 5, May 1991)

30. Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe, Inc., 296 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
Discussed in: "Toward Aligning the Law with Biology? The Federal Circuit’s About Face in Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe, Inc."
Author(s): Stolpa, John C.
4 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 339 (No. 2, 2003)

31. ETW Corp. v. Jireh Publishing, Inc., 332 F.3d 915 (6th Cir. 2003)
Discussed in: "ETW Corp. v. Jireh Publishing, Inc.: A Workable Standard, an Unworkable Decision [Right of Publicity]"
Author(s): Jasmer, Jacy T.
5 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 293 (No. 2, 2004)

32. Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., No. 12-416 (U.S. June 17, 2013)
Discussed in: "Foreword: The Future of reverse payments in the wake of FTC v. Actavis, Inc."
15 MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 1 (No. 1, Winter 2014)

33. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
Discussed in: "Copying in the Shadow of the Constitution: The Rational Limits of Trade Dress Protection"
Author(s): Davis, Theodore H., Jr.
80 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 595 (No. 3, February 1996)

34. Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 234 F.3d 558 (Fed. Cir. 2000), cert. Granted, 121 S.Ct. 2519 (June 18, 2001)
Discussed in: "Festo, Notice and Application of Prosecution History Estoppel to Means-Plus-Function Claim Limitations"
Author(s): Ulbrich, Scott G.
28 WILLIAM MITCHELL LAW REVIEW 1165 (No. 3, 2002)

35. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc., d/b/a Hobbit Travel, et. Al., A08-321 ( Minn. March 19, 2009)
Discussed in: "Hobbit Travel Gets Defense, indemnity in Trademark Suit"
Author(s): Jones, Barbara L.
13 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No. 12, March 23, 2009)

36. General Casualty Co. v. Wozniak Travel Inc., 762 NW2d 572 (Minn. 2009)
Discussed in: "On Balance: General Casualty Co. v. Wozniak Travel Inc."
Author(s): Port, Kenneth L.
3 WILLIAM MITCHELL JOURNAL OF LAW & PRACTICE 3 (No. 3, February 25, 2010)

37. Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 125 S.Ct. 2764 (2005)
Discussed in: "Third-Party Copyright Liability After Grokster"
Author(s): Yen, Alfred C.
91 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 184 (No. 1, November 2006)

38. Hagen v. Burmeister & Associates, Inc., 633 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 2001)
Discussed in: "Trade Secret Theft & Employer Vicarious Liability in Hagen v. Burmeister & Associates, Inc."
Author(s): Dobash, Tanya J.
29 WILLIAM MITCHELL LAW REVIEW 375 (No. 2, 2002)

39. Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Co., 62 F.3d 1512 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Discussed in: "Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Co.: An Equitable Solution to the Uncertainty Behind the Doctrine of Equivalents"
Author(s): Haag, Joseph F.
80 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1511 (No. 6, June 1996)

40. Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., 122 S.Ct. 1889 (2002)
Discussed in: "Holmes and the Erosion of Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction Over Patent Claims"
Author(s): Grimsrud, Timothy E.
87 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 2133 (No. 6, June 2003)

41. Honda Research & Development Co. v. Loveall, 687 F. Supp. 355 (E.D. Tenn. 1985)
Discussed in: "Protecting Discovery By Copyright"
Author(s): Jacobson, Robert J.
10 MINNESOTA DEFENSE 2 (No. 2, Spring 1989)

42. In re Charter Communications, Inc., 393 F.3d 771 (8th Cir. 2005)
Discussed in: "Will Internet Service Providers be Forced to Turn In Their Copyright Infringing Customers? The Power of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Subpoena Provision After In re Charter Communications"
Author(s): Boeve, Mikel R.
29 HAMLINE LAW REVIEW 115 (No. 1, Winter 2006)

43. In re Fisher, 421 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2005)
Discussed in: "In Re Fisher: Denial of Patents for ESTs Signals Deeper Problems in the Utility Prong for Patentability"
Author(s): Ewing, Lillian
8 MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 645 (No. 2, Spring 2007)

44. In re Seagate Tech., LLC v. Brian E. Ferguson, et al., 497 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2007)
Discussed in: "In Re Seagate: One step closer to a rational doctrine"
Author(s): McCarthy, Justin
10 MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 355 (No. 1, Winter 2009)

45. In re Trade Mark Cases, 100 U.S. 82 (1879)
Discussed in: "Supreme Court and Trademark Law in the New Millennium"
Author(s): Welkowitz, David S.
30 WILLIAM MITCHELL LAW REVIEW 1659 (No. 5, 2004)

46. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. V. Merck KGaA, 331 F.3d 860 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
Discussed in: "How Much Do We Value Research and Development?: Broadening the Experimental Use Exemption to Patent Infringement in Light of Intregra Lifesciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaA"
Author(s): Sandstrom, Kevin
30 WILLIAM MITCHELL LAW REVIEW 1059 (No. 3, 2004)

47. Johnson & Johnston Associates v. R.E. Services Co., 285 F.3d 1046 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
Discussed in: "Rebuttable Presumption of Dedication: Protecting the Hard-Luck Patentee from Johnson & Johnston's Dedication Rule"
Author(s): Hipkins, Thomas R.
87 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 779 (No. 3, February 2003)

48. Johnstech International Corp. v. JF Microtechnology SDN BHD, No. 3: 14-cv-02864-JD (N.D. Cal. June 19, 2018)
Discussed in: "Minnesota patent holder wins at trial"
Author(s): Jones, Barbara L.
92 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No. 20, August 2, 2018)

49. Lanco, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 21 N.J. Tax 200 (N.J. Tax Ct. 2003)
Discussed in: "Follow the Giraffe's Lead - Lanco, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation Gets Lost in the Quagmire that Is State Taxation"
Author(s): Olson, Cory D.
6 MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 789 (No. 2, May 2005)

50. Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 527 U.S. 370 (1996)
Discussed in: "Collateral Estoppel of Claim Interpretation After Markman"
Author(s): Clark, Rachel Marie
86 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1581 (No. 6, June 2002)

51. Masters v. UHS of Delaware, Nos. 09-3543, 09-3700 (8th Cir. January 6, 2011)
Discussed in: "No Proof of Confusion: Issue was Scope of Licensing Agreement."
Author(s): Jones, Barbara L.
15 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No.4, January 24, 2011)

52. Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2002)
Discussed in: "Speech-zilla Meets Trademark Kong?: How the Hollywood Circuit Got It Wrong in the Barbie Battle, Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc."
Author(s): Reeves, Steven Y.
4 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 285 (No. 2, 2003)

53. McElligot Inc. v. Seaborad Surety Co. and The Christensen Agency, Inc., C5-99-1562 (Minn. Ct. App. 4-4-2000)
Discussed in: "Intellectual Property Policy Doesn't Cover Contract Action"
Author(s): Brommer, Alice Sherren
4 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No. 15, April 10, 2000)

54. Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Limited, 03-1237 (U.S. Supreme Court June 13, 2005)
Discussed in: "Merck v. Integra Lifesciences: The Supreme Court Protects the Use of Patented Compounds in Preclinical Studies"
Author(s): Mota, Sue
29 HAMLINE LAW REVIEW 53 (No. 1, Winter 2006)

55. Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/03-1237.html
Discussed in: "Testing Drugs And Testing Limits: Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. And The Scope Of The Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor Provision"
Author(s): Hareid, Jonathan A.
7 MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 713 (No. 2, May 2006)

56. Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 545 U.S. 193 (2005)
Discussed in: "Evaluating the Integrity of Biotechnology Research Tools: Merck v. Integra and the Scope of 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1)"
Author(s): Mischnick, Michael R.
91 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 484 (No. 2, December 2006)

57. Metro-Goldwin-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, LTD., No. 04-480 (U.S. June 27, 2005)
Discussed in: "Nobody Uses Betamax Anymore and Neither Should the Supreme Court: Why Metro-Goldwin-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, LTD. Should Be Overturned"
Author(s): Rust, Matthew J.
28 HAMLINE LAW REVIEW 549 (No. 3, Summer 2005)

58. National Broadcasting Co. v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, 848 F.2d 1289 (D.C. Cir. 1988)
Discussed in: "Right to Cable Royalties and the Divisibility of Copyright: Understanding the Interaction"
[Case Note: Barris Industries v. Worldvision Enterprises, 875 F.2d 1446 (9th Cir. 1989)].
Author(s): Layton, Jacqueline A.
74 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1137 (No. 5, May 1990)

59. National Council on Teacher Quality v. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, A12-2031 (Minn. Ct. App. August 5, 2013)
Discussed in: "C of A: MnSCU must provide syllabi to nonprofit: Opinion cites 'fair use' intent."
Author(s): Nelson, Todd
17 MINNESOTA LAWYER 12 (No. 32, August 12, 2013)

60. New York Times Company v. Tasini, 121 S.Ct. 2381 (2001)
Discussed in: "Electronic Trap for the Unwary: Tasini Decision Favors Freelance Authors Over Publishers"
Author(s): McDonald, Daniel
70 HENNEPIN LAWYER 10 (No. 11, November 2001)

61. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., No. 12-1315 (U.S. May 19, 2014)
Discussed in: "KO for common affirmative defense? Gauging the impact of the 'Raging Bull' copyright ruling."
Author(s): Atkins, Kimberly
18 MINNESOTA LAWYER 12 (No. 22, June 2, 2014)

62. Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp. and Excite, Inc., 55 F. Supp.2d 1070 (C.D. Cal. 1999)
Discussed in: "Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp. and Excite, Inc.: The Impact of Banner Ad Keying on the Development of E-commerce"
Author(s): Wu, Michael
2 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 161 (No. 1, 2001)

63. Prairie Field Services v. Welsh, et. al., No. 20-cv-2160 (ECT/KMM) (D. Minn. Oct. 29, 2020)
Discussed in: "Judge orders company to return business data"
Author(s): Featherly, Kevin
94 MINNESOTA LAWYER 3 (No. 48, November 5, 2020)

64. QXMedical, LLC v. Vascular Solutions, LLC, 408 F. Supp. 3d 996, 1012-1014 (D. Minn.2019)
Discussed in: "Medical Device Manufacturer Not Liable for Inducing Customers' Patent Infringement"
Author(s): Merrill, Courtland
93 MINNESOTA LAWYER 5 (No. 77, February 17, 2020)

65. Regents of the University of Minnesota v. LSI Corp., 926 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2019)
Discussed in: "University of Minnesota rebuffed at Supreme Court over patent challenges"
Author(s): Decker, Susan
93 MINNESOTA LAWYER 5 (No. 68, January 16, 2020)

66. Rottlund Company v. Pinnacle Corporation, A05-1296 (8th Circuit June 20, 2006)
Discussed in: "Role Of Expert Witnesses In Architectural Copyright Litigation"
Author(s): Bloomquist, Mark A.
75 HENNEPIN LAWYER 24 (No. 10, November 2006)

67. Seagate Technology LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, et al., 834 N.W.2d 555 (2013)
Discussed in: "A boatload of interest at stake"
Author(s): Jones, Barbara L.
19 MINNESOTA LAWYER 5 (No. 47, November 23, 2015)

68. Seagate Technology v. Western Digital Corp., et al., A12-1944 (Minn. October 8, 2014)
Discussed in: "Arbitration sanctions upheld: Party punished for fabricating evidence."
Author(s): Jones, Barbara L.
18 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No. 41, October 13, 2014)

69. Sleep Number Corporation v. Young, No. 21-1784 (8th Cir. May 11, 2022)
Discussed in: "Court rules for Sleep Number: 8th U.S. Circuit upholds preliminary injunction in technology ownership fight"
Author(s): Brown, Laura
96 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No.1, May 23, 2022)

70. Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp., 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000)
Discussed in: "Where to Draw the Line between Reverse Engineering and Infringement: Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp."
Author(s): Prestin, Derek
3 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 137 (No. 1, 2002)

71. Stephen Kimble, et al. v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, 13-720
Discussed in: "The Supreme Court tells patent licensors to get creative"
Author(s): Fairbairn, Grant
19 MINNESOTA LAWYER 8 (No. 38, September 21, 2015)

72. Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc., No. 17-1762 (8th Cir. Nov. 2, 2018)
Discussed in: "1 Sturgis trademark crashes, others may ride again"
Author(s): Jones, Barbara L.
92 MINNESOTA LAWYER 1 (No. 50, November 15, 2018)

73. Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation, 277 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
Discussed in: "Prosecution Laches in the Wake of Symbol Technologies: What is "Unreasonable and Unexplained" Delay?"
Author(s): Hawkins, Michael T.
87 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1621 (No. 5, May 2003)

74. Tasini v. New York Times, 533 U.S. 583 (2001)
Discussed in: "Copyright, Containers, and the Court: A reply to Professor Leaffer"
Author(s): Schaumann, Niels
30 WILLIAM MITCHELL LAW REVIEW 1617 (No. 5, 2004)

75. TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displys, Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 121 S.Ct. 1255, 149 L.Ed. 2d 164 (2001)
Discussed in: "Limiting Protection for Product Configuration Trade Dress: The Supreme Court Directs TrafFix"
Author(s): Schultz, David
70 HENNEPIN LAWYER 6 (No. 11, November 2001)

76. TurboCare v. General Electric, 264 F.3d 1111 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
Discussed in: "Narrowing Claim Amendment or Just Redefining the Invention: Prosecution History Estoppel and the Doctrine of Equivalents under TurboCare v. General Electric"
Author(s): Onderick, Paul C.
4 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 123 (No. 1, 2002)

77. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. MP3.COM, 92 F. Supp.2d 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)
Discussed in: "Information Wants to be Free"
[Case Notes: Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Shawn C. Reimerdes, 111 F. Supp.2d 294 (S.D.N.Y. 2000); A & M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 114 F. Supp.2d 896 (N.D. Cal. 2000)].
Author(s): Poquette, Bruce R.
22 HAMLINE JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW & POLICY 175 (No. 1, Fall 2000)

78. United States v. Jeffrey J. Reichert, 747 F.3d 445 (2014)
Discussed in: "Keeping Princess Peach locked in her castle: criminal liability for trafficking circumvention technology - United States v. Reichert"
Author(s): Abdo, Jacob M.
41 WILLIAM MITCHELL LAW REVIEW 1470 (No. 4, 2015)

79. United States v. LaMacchia, 871 F. Supp. 535 (D. Mass. 1994)
Discussed in: "Taming the Electronic Frontier: Software Copyright Protection in the Wake of U.S. v. LaMacchia"
Author(s): Kim, Teddy C.
80 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1255 (No. 5, May 1996)

80. Waco International v. KHK Scaffolding, et. al., C.A. No. 00-20741. F.3d. (5th Cir. 2002).
Discussed in: "How the Seizure of Counterfeit Goods Can Go Bad: Waco International v. KHK Scaffolding, et. al."
Author(s): Coblenz, Michael
3 MINNESOTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 59 (No. 1, 2002)

81. West Publishing Co. v. Mead Data Central, Inc., 799 F.2d 1219 (8th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 107 S.Ct. 962 (1987)
Discussed in: "Copyright Protection for Citations to a Law Reporter: West Publishing Co. v. Mead Data Central, Inc"
Author(s): Anderson, William L.
71 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 991 (No. 4, April 1987)

82. White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 971 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1992)
Discussed in: "Starstruck: Overextension of Celebrity Publicity Rights in State and Federal Courts"
Author(s): Clay, Steven C.
79 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 485 (No. 2, December 1994)