Home Home   |   Library   |   Gen'l Search   |   Articles   |   Judges
  Minnesota | Wisconsin | World
LAWMOOSE MEMBER CENTER
User Name   Password  
  Options   Awards   Reviews   More about LawMoose...  
Home Categories:
Wisconsin & Local Law
Wisconsin & Local Government
Federal Law
Federal Government
Other U.S. States & Jurisdictions
Legal Reference
Legal History
Legal Education & Careers
Legal Topics & Problems
Litigation & ADR
Forms & Documents
Wisconsin Lawyers
Pro Bono & Pro Se
Spanish, Hmong & Somali Language Legal Resources

 
Wisconsin Legal Reference Library
Search the Library:          search tips

Library Home
Election and Campaign Law

Judicial Selection and Elections

Resources in this category:
   Wisconsin Judicial Selection (American Judicature Society)
   Judicial Selection in the States (American Judicature Society)
   Justice at Stake Campaign
"Justice at Stake is a nonpartisan campaign working to keep our courts fair and impartial. Justice at Stake Campaign partners educate the public and work for reforms to keep politics and special interests out of the courtroomso judges can do their job protecting our Constitution, our rights and the rule of law. JAS is currently funded by grants from the Open Society Institute, Carnegie Corporation, and the Joyce Foundation."
   Republican Party of Minnesota et al. v. Suzanne White, in her capacity as Chairperson of the Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards, et al., No. 99-4021 (8th Cir. August 2, 2005) by Beam, Circuit Judge (August 8, 2005) (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit)
"The Supreme Court's remand requires us to consider two issues in light of White: the constitutional viability of the partisan-activities and solicitation clauses of Canon 5.1 [of the Minnesota Supreme Court's canons of judicial conduct]. ... "In White, the Supreme Court invalidated the announce clause and remanded[.] Upon further consideration of the partisan-activities and solicitation clauses in light of White, ... they likewise do not survive strict scrutiny and thus violate the First Amendment."

"Since our ruling today essentially moots any viable Fourteenth Amendment claims, we leave them for consideration on another day, if necessary."

80 pages, including a lengthy dissent.

   Republican Party of Minnesota et al. v. White, Chairperson, Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards, et al., 536 U.S. 765 (2002) (June 27, 2002) (Legal Information Institute)

See also:
  • Wisconsin State Court Judges
  • First Amendment Law - Speech, Press, Religion
  • Judicial Ethics
  • Similar resources in our Minnesota Legal Reference Library
  • Top  


    Search the Library:           Library Home


    Please suggest a new category, a new item for this category, or improved categorization. Tell us about dead and changed links!


    We hope you find our Public Edition to be useful.

    But we want you to know that our best and most useful material is provided only by subscription.

    Our Enhanced Subscriber Edition turns you into a far more efficient, more effective user of the vast legal and governmental resources scattered across the Web as well as those that comprise the heart of Wisconsin-specific legal and governmental resources and law-practice related knowledge.

    Call us or contact us through the site to learn how your firm or organization can put the full power of our Wisconsin Law Practice WebSM at your service.

    Powered by LawsaurusTM expert support system software from Pritchard Law Webs.

    Home | About LawMoose | Ask Us to Contact You | Send Us Feedback | Terms & Conditions
    © 2000-2024 Pritchard Law Webs, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Ph. 612-332-0102. All Rights Reserved.
    LawMoose, Laugment, Laugment Relationship Language, LawSaurus, Home of the Minnesota Legal Web, Minnesota Law Practice Web, Home of the Wisconsin Legal Web, Wisconsin Law Practice Web, LawMoose World Legal Resource Center, MooseBoost, and Lawyer Selector are service marks of Pritchard Law Webs.